Re: [msysGit] Re: MinGW port pull request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> * The #ifdef in setup.c, prefix_filename() could easily be removed by using 
> the MINGW32 arm everywhere. This would penalize non-Windows, however, 
> prefix_filename() is not performance critical.
>
>>  * There is an interaction with dr/ceiling topic that is already in 'next'
>>    that needs to be resolved before we merge this in 'next'.
>
> How do you want me to proceed? Rebase on top of dr/ceiling? Wait until 
> dr/ceiling is in master and rebase again? Merge it into my series? (I would 
> make the merge the last commit in my series.) I'm asking because support of 
> dr/ceiling was not overwhelming.

I personally feel MinGW branch is more important than ceiling work, not
just because it targets far wider audience but because it affects a lot
wider area.  j6t/mingw _will_ eventually graduate to master in some form
(possibly after fixups that is needed to keep things working on non
Windows environment), and dr/ceil may or may not.

So my preference would be to merge j6t/mingw into dr/ceil branch soon,
resolve conflicts there, and merge the result to 'next' when j6t/mingw is
merged to 'next' at the same time.  And you can help with that merge when
it happens.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux