On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 08:04:14PM -0700, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > As usual, comments are welcome. :-) > > Thanks. > > I take that last line of comment to mean "this is still RFC and not for > inclusion yet" ;-) I think the series is fine up to eighth patch (get > octopus merge base). In fact only the version that had "WIP" in the subject was sent not for inclusion. ;-) > I'll queue the whole thing (still strictly as "test merge" basis) to 'pu'; > I've fixed 3 "old-style C function definition" issues you have in the > tenth patch (build in merge), and I have some other issues with the ninth > one (filter independent). Thanks. I'm using the kernel's scripts/checkpatch.pl, but it does not have such a check, and I missed it. Currently I have 12 patches in my branch; if there will be no objections to the new "filter independent" one, then I will resend the series excluding the first 8 to avoid unnecessary traffic, if that is OK to you.
Attachment:
pgps43Q46TnsY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
