Re: [PATCH 09/11] Introduce filter_independent() in commit.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 01:53:06PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > More worryingly, the flag is supposed to be cleaned from the objects 
> > after get_merge_bases() returns.  I am not sure what you'll learn by 
> > looking at the flag here.
> 
> That is a valid point, methinks.  Probably the octopus_merge_base and the 
> cleanup have to be decoupled here.  The cleanup should be nothing more 
> than calling clear_commit_marks() for every head.

Actually get_octopus_merge_bases() _needs_ to clean up the flags as it
calls get_merge_bases() multiple times and get_merge_bases() expects
empty flags.

> A test case would be desirable, but probably pretty complicated.  Hmm.  I 
> like tests when they are simple, because they are easy to verify by a 
> human.  Miklos, any chance for such a test case?

Sure, I'll write one.

Attachment: pgpn3IkioFvqS.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux