Pieter de Bie wrote:
While this is already possible with the :<dst> refspec syntax, a flag specifically for this action is more userfriendly.
I like it. I always have to tell my co-workers which side of the colon the branch-name to delete should be on. Since they want the remote to lose the branch, it seems logical to some of them to make that side empty. This would make one (very small) headache of mine go away. Question though; does it delete the currently checked out branch if no branch-name is given? I'd prefer if one has to explicitly name the branch to delete. -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
