Hi, On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > > > > > diff --git a/setup.c b/setup.c > > > index d630e37..1643ee4 100644 > > > --- a/setup.c > > > +++ b/setup.c > > > @@ -292,7 +292,8 @@ void setup_work_tree(void) > > > work_tree = get_git_work_tree(); > > > git_dir = get_git_dir(); > > > if (!is_absolute_path(git_dir)) > > > > I suspect it needs "work_tree &&" here. > > I'm not clear on the semantics of !get_git_work_tree(); is a non-absolute > path for git_dir right then? My reading was: if there is no work_tree, then a relative git_dir is just fine, since we are quite unlikely to jump around in the file system. And your implementation of make_relative_path() is nice enough to a (work_tree ==) base == NULL, but would return the absolute path in that case. Haven't had time to test anything, though. Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html