Re: git-rerere observations and feature suggestions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:19:03AM +0200, Karl Hasselström <kha@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What you're describing is pretty much what we're thinking about doing
> -- have a log branch where each commit contains enough metadata to
> recreate the complete patch stack state at that point in time, and has
> all the parents it needs to be safe from gc.
> 
> The particular problem I'm asking about here is that due to StGit's
> concept of "unapplied" patches that are per definition not reachable
> from the current branch head, a given log entry might have to keep an
> unbounded number of commits from being gc'ed. Thus my question about
> what would blow up if we were to make a commit with 50 parents. Or
> 100. Or 1000, if our users are crazy enough. (The alternative being,
> of course, to make a tree of octopuses with a fixed maximum fan-out.)

I may miss something, but you have (at least) two options to store
"patches".

You can store them as a blob, make a tree of them and make a commit in
the log branch point to the tree. This one has the advantage of being
able to do a 'git log' on a particular patch of the patch set.

The other one is to create n+1 trees (and commits, where the first
commit has no parent) for n patches, and point to the last commit from
the log branch.

Attachment: pgp7VRAZQu4vT.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux