Re: Incorrect default for git stash?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Eric Raible <raible@xxxxxxxxx>:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster <at> pobox.com> writes:
>  
>> Read the whole thread:
>> 
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/63566/focus=63784
>
> I'm glad to know that that was already hashed out, even if it
> didn't end up the way I would have decided.

Then I suspect you did not read the whole thread, as we have not "ended up"
in anywhere yet.

In particular, in

  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/63566/focus=63781

Junio maps out the next steps for people, who would want the behavior of
the command changed, to take.  None of these follow-up steps have been
taken by people who wanted to change the behavior of the command.

I can well imagine an alternative to make the command "list" by default
when stash.defaultsave is set to false, and actually suggested it earlier
with a patch, but I think the list consensus was negative.

  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/68539/focus=69045

-- 
Nanako Shiraishi
http://ivory.ap.teacup.com/nanako3/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get a free email address with REAL anti-spam protection.
http://www.bluebottle.com/tag/1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux