Re: Incorrect default for git stash?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:21:23PM +0000, Eric Raible wrote:

> Does it bother anyone else that the default for
> git stash is inconsistent with branch & tag?
> 
> git branch -> list branches
> git tag    -> list tags
> git stash  -> create a stash
> 
> I understand that branches & tags must explicitly named
> and that stashes are by default automatically named.
> 
> But wouldn't it be less surprising to me if the default
> was 'list' instead of 'save'?

I don't know if it still bothers people, but this was discussed when
stash was first merged:

  http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/git/2007/7/1/250414

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux