Re: [PATCH] test-lib.sh: add --long-tests option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lea Wiemann <lewiemann@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> I am guessing that the reason why you do not unset GIT_TEST_LONG upfront
>> in the script is because the user can do:
>>
>>         $ GIT_TEST_LONG=t; export GIT_TEST_LONG
>>         $ ./t9999-this-test.sh
>>         $ ./t9999-that-test.sh
>>
>> or even:
>>
>> 	$ GIT_TEST_LONG=t make test
>
> Yes, that's the idea.
>
>> If that is the case, however, I wonder if this --long-tests option is even
>> necessary.
>
> It's very convenient for development, where you go back and forth
> between "./t9503-gitweb-Mechanize.sh -v -l" and
> "./t9503-gitweb-Mechanize.sh -v".  All it takes is to add or remove
> the "-l" at each invocation.  So I think the switch is actually quite
> useful.

Heh, one-shot export "GIT_TEST_LONG_t ./t9999-this-test.sh" would equally
be swift, but Ok.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux