Re: Document clone of clone loosing branches?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> These fall into "quibbling" category, but that judgement can only be made
> by people who know the history.

I allowed myself to quibble much more than usually as I think it
serves a good technical purpose. I am a new git user but quite
pervasive in getting all the info I can (I have bound copy of all git
man pages and about ten tutorials, diligently devoting much of my time
last month to reading it all; generally I am not scared by strange
things like plain Tex, FORTH, Prolog etc.) so I might serve as a good
example of user who tried hard and still did not get it with current
docs.

But it is a thin border, so please do not hesitate to shut me up if my
judgement of technical merit is wrong.

> Updates to glossary and other introductory documents might be necessary.
> For example, the entry about "tracking branch" in the glossary still talks
> about the ancient convention of copying 'master' to 'origin' as a regular
> branch:

I would appreciate this update ;-)

Regards (and big thanks for git!),

Vaclav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux