Re: git bugs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:44:43AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> You can fix this multiple ways. One would be to pick another size that is 
> simply less likely (eg ~0 instead), which leaves the theoretical race, and 
> just makes it practically impossible to hit (not that I think it's very 
> practical to hit already).

Hmm. I may have just hit it in the test suite.

Try this:

  cd git/t
  for i in `seq 1 1000`; do
    ./t4126-apply-empty.sh -v -i || break
  done
  echo made it to $i

Most of the time it works, but somewhere in that thousand (generally
within a few hundred), I end up with a failed test. The failure looks
like:

   * expecting success:
           git reset --hard &&
           >empty &&
           rm -f missing &&
           git apply --index patch0 &&
           test_cmp expect empty &&
           git diff --exit-code

   HEAD is now at e3f79fd initial
   error: empty: does not match index
   * FAIL 3: apply --index empty

> The other approach is to know that an empty blob always has a very 
> specific SHA1. Here's an trial patch.

However, I can still trigger the failure with your patch, so I wonder if
it is some other race entirely...

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux