El 13/6/2008, a las 7:48, Jeff King escribió:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:46:34AM -0500, Brandon Casey wrote:
from reflogs even though stashes are implemented using reflogs. The
big
difference is that reflogs are created automatically and stashes
are created
by explicit user action. Automatically deleting something that git
creates
automatically is ok and desirable, doing so for something the user
explicitly
created is not necessarily so.
Wincent made this same argument. I don't really agree with it. It is
predicated on the assumption that stashing something _is_ asking for
git
to remember it.
For me it is quite clear that stashing something _is_ asking for Git
to remember it. It's an explicit user action. It's a request to
remember something. Whether or not this is actually the best tool for
the job of long-term storage is much less important than the fact that
the user explicitly requested it. IMO this trumps all other factors.
Just because "stash" sounds quicker than "commit" doesn't make it any
less of an instruction to Git to store something.
Wincent
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
