Re: "git pull . <branch>" versus "git merge <branch>"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Rene Herman wrote:

> Good day.
> 
> The manpages seem to be making somewhat of a point of mentioning "git pull .
> <branch>" as the way to merge a local branch into the current one but a simple
> "git merge <branch>" seems to work well. Is there a difference?

Those manpage sections predate the existance of "git merge <branch>". If 
you're not planning to use git before November 2006, there's no reason to 
use the "git pull ." form. They should probably be replaced with more 
helpful examples at this point.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux