On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The manpages seem to be making somewhat of a point of mentioning "git pull . > <branch>" as the way to merge a local branch into the current one but a > simple "git merge <branch>" seems to work well. Is there a difference? git pull also does a fetch in it's usual mode of operation, and runs git merge to do merge changes in the remote-tracking branches. Dave. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
