Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Ahh, ok. Yes, we should probably re-think our 'grafts' file thing, or at > least not document it, because it's actually a wondeful way to just cause > more corruption by hiding things (ie if you clone a repo with a grafts > file, the result will now have neither the grafts file _nor_ the state > that was hidden by it, so the result is guaranteed to be corrupt). "Graft and then clone" will not make the copied repository Ok. You need to propagate the graft in some other way. However, "Graft and then filter-branch" is a way to hide and get rid of the the broken thing in history etched in the objects. After that the repository itself and a clone from it will not need the graft. So I'd rather argue we should document it _differently_ (or just _better_) than not document it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
