On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Karl Hasselström <kha@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If there's just one patch in the tar file, why did you use a tar file > in the first place instead of just gzipping? I guess mostly habbit :P. Whenever I zip something I create a gzipped tarball because that's how I usually do it. > I'm pretty sure that anyone who really has use for the tar-file > capability would be using tar files with multiple patches in them. Yeah, I guess that's true for most people indeed. > I was refering to the fact that due to tar-files in the general case > containing more than one patch, you'd have to modify the parts of > imprt.py that deal with importing multiple patches at once, in > addition to the parts the current patch touches. Mhhh, yeah, but should be something like for patch in patches applyPatch(patch) > But you're probably right that the amount of additional work would not > be much more than what went into the current patch. To just support .tar, yeah, but let's see what the author has to say about this ;). -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
