Re: [PATCH] remote show: fix the -n option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin a écrit :
> 
> For me, a dry run is something that avoids the high-cost operations.

See:
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dry_Run_(testing)
 http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/dryrun?view=uk
 http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_1861689507/dry_run.html

It's more "do something as it was for real but it's not". It has nothing
to do with high-cost operations or something like that.

Yes?

> I would not like to remove the got_states.  I think this is the wrong 
> direction.  Rather change the die() into a return error().

OK, I will try that.

-- 
Olivier.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux