Re: [PATCH] progress.c: avoid use of dynamic-sized array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 8 Jun 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jun 2008, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
> > Dynamically sized arrays are gcc and C99 construct.  Using them hurts
> > portability to older compilers, although using them is nice in this case
> > it is not desirable.  This patch removes the only use of the construct
> > in stop_progress_msg(); the function is about writing out a single line
> > of a message, and the existing callers of this function feed messages
> > of only bounded size anyway, so use of dynamic array is simply overkill.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Boyd Lynn Gerber <gerberb@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > --
> > Boyd Gerber <gerberb@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ZENEZ	1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah  84047
> > 
> > ---
> 
> Do you really want to have your mail signature in the commit message, 
> particularly because...
> 
> > [...]
> >
> >  	clear_progress_signal();
> >  	free(progress->throughput);
> > -- 
> > 1.5.2.4
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Boyd Gerber <gerberb@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ZENEZ	1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah  84047
> 
> You repeat it at the end of the mail anyway?
> 
> The patch looks fine to me, though.

I put it in because in the git repo it is not their.  Only in the email.  
It is fine to remove it.

--
Boyd Gerber <gerberb@xxxxxxxxx>
ZENEZ	1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah  84047
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux