On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > rwa000@xxxxxxxxx (Robert Anderson) writes: > >> From 7af03a835b7311c501f2147e25f428642fc3acb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > FYI this line is not necessary, and should be removed from > git-format-patch output when pasting it to your MUA. Err, then shouldn't it be removed from format-patch, rather than deleted manually every time format-patch is used? >> From: Robert W. Anderson <rwa000@xxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 23:53:37 -0700 >> Subject: [PATCH] improve doc heading for git-bisect > > FYI the above isn't strictly necessary: if you have 'From:' header set > correctly you can simply set subject of email, and put in body the > rest of commit message and patch only, without extra mail-like > headers. Then remove them from format-patch, IMO. >> Improve awkward heading in git-bisect documentation. > [...] >> -Avoiding to test a commit >> -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> +Changing the revision to test >> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> >> If in a middle of bisect session, you know what the bisect suggested >> to try next is not a good one to test (e.g. the change the commit > > It is, I guess, better, but is it the best heading? What we want to > describe here is how to deal when bisect stops on commit which cannot > be tested (e.g. project does not compile). I disagree. The situation you want to use this is more general than that. Maybe you could test it, but doing so would be a waste of time because the commit is a trivial comment change. In general, this simply what you need to know when you want to change the revision under test. Bob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
