On Tue, 5 Jun 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Both the --porcelain and --incremental format shared the same output
> format but implemented with two identical codepaths. This merges them
> into one shared function.
They have _almost_ the same, but not _exactly_ the same output:
INCREMENTAL OUTPUT
------------------
[...]
The output format is similar to the Porcelain format, but it
does not contain the actual lines from the file that is being
annotated.
[...]
. Unlike Porcelain format, the filename information is always
given and terminates the entry:
"filename" <whitespace-quoted-filename-goes-here>
and thus it's really quite easy to parse for some line- and
word-oriented parser (which should be quite natural for most
scripting languages).
But I guess this got addresssed in the patch, doesn't it?
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
