On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > It would make a wonderfully helpful tool less helpful. I don't agree. Tool is tool. Every tool can be used in a wrong way. A notice to documentation that some of functionality should be used very carefully should be enough. > > Also, having a possibility to easy remove a changeset (hardly - not > > revert) without touching all other changesets on top is a function worth > > to include. > > The problem there is that you -- again -- lie about the committers. They > _never_ saw, approved, or tested those commits. If I changed portion of unpublished tree, as maintainer I can combine any patches and it might make sense to keep at least my commit dates for my reference. Thanks, Jaroslav ----- Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx> Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer ALSA Project, Red Hat, Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
