You wrote: > On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 09:53:54AM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote: > > > On the other hand it would be just as powerful. Manually splitting a > > hunk is, in the general case, only possible in "my" scheme. However, > > to make any difference, you later have to answer 'n' to some of the > > sub-hunks. So in "your" scheme, you could just have deleted the lines > > in question. > > Sorry, I've gotten lost in which is mine and which is yours. Yours is > the original patch or this patch? Mine is the proposal that spawned this > patch, or my comments on this patch? I should have provided a definition, sorry. By "your" scheme, I meant the one where one is restricted to deleting existing lines, and thus deletes '-' lines to disable them; by "my" scheme, where one is free to edit and changes '-' lines to context to disable them. At least it's my current understanding that, under the above definition, "your" scheme is what you actually proposed in http://www.spinics.net/lists/git/msg67478.html [why doesn't Google find gmane?] but I misunderstood and implemented "my" scheme. [Let's just forget about the original patch at the top of the thread; in retrospect, it _is_ clunky, and the UI didn't get any replies in favour.] - Thomas -- Thomas Rast trast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
