Hi, On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Jakub Narebski wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > One of the things I could imagine using git for is to have "annotation > > branches" for things like code review etc. They'd be a real branch in > > their own right and with their own history, but at the same time they > > could well want to point back to the "code branch" that they annotate > > by considering that another parent in a "non-data merge" (and yes, > > you'd obviously have to use a special merge strategy for things like > > that, but you'd likely integrate it in some "annotation tool chain" > > rather than anything else). > > By the way, what is status of git-notes / commit annotations? Did it got > abandoned, on hiatus, or what? You probably meant to Cc: me, and Linus, right? I all but abandoned it. It works, but I do not need it, and kind of waited for the guy who wanted them to chime in, so that I did not waste my time in vain. IIRC it was Johan Herland, but I could be wrong. Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
