Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 3 June 2008, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> I think that octopus merge (merge with more than two parents/legs) is 
>> feature which is unique to git (isn't it?).  
> 
> bzr can do similar things:
> 
> bzr merge some-branch
> bzr merge --force some-other-branch
> bzr commit
> 
> Since bzr doesn't auto-commit after a merge, the above commands
> actually creates only one revision with 3 parents (the --force is here
> to let merge do it's job with uncommited changes in the tree).

But does it store octopus merge as octopus: commit with more than
two parents?  In git making octopus merge is easy, perhaps too easy...


True, the above actually could be inferred from mentioned blog post
  http://vcscompare.blogspot.com/2008/05/meet-candidates.html
namely that there were problems with converting git repositories
containing octopus merges to Mercurial (and there was a bug in 
git-fast-export which made bzr-fast-import crash on them).

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux