On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 11:34:19AM -0700, david@xxxxxxx wrote: >> Did you mean "init" here instead of clone? The clone should have created >> at least one branch (generally master, but depending on the current >> branch of the cloned repo). > > no, it was definantly a clone, and it did not create a master branch (at > least not one that showed up with git branch -a) Hmm. It's possible that you cloned a repo that didn't have its HEAD pointing at the master branch (for example, one with a detached HEAD). And that would explain how you got into that situation (and either way, the discussed ways out of the situation apply). -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
