Junio C Hamano wrote:
Christian Couder <chriscool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
It seems not very friendly to just "return 1" when not bisecting.
And before my last patch to use BISECT_START to check if we are bisecting,
it would perhaps have been better to use 'test -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_NAMES"'.
The reason for this silence is because Santi wants to call potential
culprits in turn and stop when one responds "Yeah, I am the guilty one who
threw a monkey wrench into the user's workflow". For that to work, "No,
the user is not in the middle of any interaction with me" response needs
to be silent.
Hrm. Do both? Have the normal interactive user command
be more verbose, but let the pseudo-scripted version supply
an additional --status-only flag as it sequences through
the status checks?
jdl
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
