On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Brandon Casey <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Shouldn't we be encouraging the use of 'git log -g' rather than 'git reflog'? > git-reflog seems more like plumbing than porcelain to me. I had no idea, but then again, the man pages don't mention whether something is plumbing or porcelain anywhere... But I guess 'git log -g' is easier to use (since it supplies the user with most of git log's features) than git reflog. I was introduced to reflog by someone advising me to use it, so I was merely "passing on" that advice, unknowing of 'git log -g' :). -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
