On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 06:07:34PM -0700, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > On the other hand the a..b and a...b notation is matter of convenience > (it is easier to use than "b ^a" or "a b --not $(git merge-base a > b)"); perhaps allowing a..b and a...b notation for git-diff was an > error... but it makes copy'n'paste easier... I believe that the error was how these operations were defined for diff. I would rather expect to 'git diff a..b' to produce the accumulative patch of 'git log -p a..b', but currently 'git diff a..b' is equivalent of 'git diff a b', and this is redundant and confusing. As to 'git diff a...b', it would be nice if it showed three way diff. At least, it is how I would define them if I were writing some front-end. Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
