On Thu, 22 May 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > One potential worry/downside is "bisect visualize". Because <bisect> > branch was used for bisection, the _current_ commit has always been > indicated with a label. HEAD would not get any special label in gitk, > would it? This is a general problem in gitk. It's worse than not showing a label, btw. If it doesn't realize what the HEAD is (and it won't), it also doesn't show the fake "uncommitted changes" commit(s). Test by doing something like git checkout HEAD^ echo "Dummy change" >> Makefile gitk and note the lack of both pointer to detached head and the lack of notice about local uncommitted changes. Paul? Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
