Twiinz <twiinz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > In this case it is a very trivial patch. Anyone who tries to do > > the same thing is likely to come up with the same result, or one > > that is close enough that it looks identical anyway. > > > > Still, it isn't in my main tree, because it is lacking a proper > > Signed-off-by tag by the original author. > > Sorry for the late response, > > It's a very trivial patch, indeed. > > I'm still a bit confused with those Signed-off-by things. Anyway I > sign hereby that: > - I coded those few lines myself > - I didn't steal them from anyone > - I'm not going to sue anybody over its utilization See "Sign your work" of git.git/Documentation/SubmittingPatches: http://repo.or.cz/w/git.git?a=blob;f=Documentation/SubmittingPatches;h=0e155c936c25255706bc6d47651c2b336c628417;hb=377d9c409ffe0f0d994b929aeb94716139207b9d I think most reasonable people would say your statement has roughly the same intent and effect as the Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1. > If there's more that need to be done to get this patch approved please > point me to some online materials that detail the process. > > I hope that helps, I'm going to edit your commit and add the signed off by line for you: Signed-off-by: Twiinz <twiinz@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks. -- Shawn. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
