Re: git mergetool vs stash apply

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Alexander Gladysh" <agladysh@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> So there is perhaps something specific about your setup or your conflict
>>> that is causing mergetool not to work as expected.
>>
>> Most likely so.
>>
>>> Can you give us a test case that fails?
>>
>> No, unfortunately I can not. I was unable to produce a minimal test
>> case, and I can not share the whole repo.
>
> Can you use contents-scrambling tool by Jeff King from
>  Message-ID: <20080510055332.GB11556@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/81652

I have some questions:

1. My repo is 650+ MB, my working copy is 350+ KLOC. That size is hard
to share. Would that tool reduce it enough? Is it possible to filter
out irrelevant content somehow?
2. Would that tool obfuscate binaries as well?

Furthermore, I have tried to reproduce that bug once again (by
checking out that problematic revision and trying to apply that git
stash on it) and was unable to (but my repo has changed since that).
Perhaps it was some "moonphase-related" fluctuation...

Sorry for the noise.
Alexander.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux