Stephen R. van den Berg wrote (2008-05-14 00:46 +0300): > Teemu Likonen wrote: > >This way the "daily" gc would operate very fast (as it leaves .keep > >packs alone), and with gc --aggressive user could easily decide when to > >create new landmark .keep packs (and also prune possible dangling > >objects inside previous .keep packs). Normal user don't need to know the > >details. Just run gc occasionally and maybe gc --aggressive when better > >optimization is needed. > > >How does this sound? > > It sounds sound :-). > I like the simplicity. It turned out that gc --aggressive is not what I thought it was, i.e. "pack aggressively and efficiently". So my suggestion implies the semantics that --aggressive would do effective compressing. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
