Re: Git branches - confusing behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Symonds wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Dima Kagan <dima.kagan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> That's a subjective point of view :) I'm coming from the SVN world and uncommitted changes on one branch don't affect other branches. Is there a way I can achieve this behavior with git?
> 
> If you *really* want SVN's behaviour of "branches", just copy your
> whole working tree (including the .git directory) and start making
> changes in that. Then they'll be completely separate and you can just
> 'cd' between them.
> 
> 
> Dave.

What's the point of using git then? :) I like the way branches are created and switched in git, but I would like each branch to preserve it's own history of modifications. Is that too much to ask? :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux