Re: git gc & deleted branches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sat, 10 May 2008, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 09:51:15PM -0400, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:

> >> When you create a new working directory, you would also create in the
> >> original repository a symlink named
> >> e.g. orig_repo/.git/peers/<some-arbitrary-name-that-doesn't-matter> that
> >> points to the .git directory of the newly created working directory.
> 
> > That assumes you _can_ write to the original repository. That may or may
> > not be the case, depending on your setup.

FWIW this argument can be found in the mailing list.  It does not have to 
be told over and over again, right?

> Well, I suppose in that case it could print a warning or maybe fail 
> without some "force" option.  If you can't write to the repository, then 
> I think it is safe to say that it will never know or care about you, so 
> you will fundamentally have a fragile setup.  I'd say that except in 
> very special circumstances, you are better off just not sharing it at 
> all.

Counterexample kernel.org.  Counterexample repo.or.cz.

Hth,
Dscho

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux