On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 07:08:50PM -0700, Steven Grimm wrote: > On May 7, 2008, at 6:58 PM, Chris Shoemaker wrote: >> Second, what will happen when different developers have svn URLs with >> different schemes, e.g. http vs. svn+ssh? > > That will cause the commit messages to be different, which means you won't > have the same commit hashes, so this pretty much won't be useful. (You'd > end up fetching the remote repo's entire svn history if you tried to do git > fetch.) Yes, indeed. But git fetching even the entire svn history is probably often faster than git-svn fetching even one commit! I guess the question is really, if I replace my remote tracking branch with someone else's remote tracking branch, and it invalidates old map entries, what breaks? Note, that even a slight difference in svn.authorsfile would have the same effect. > The assumption here is that you have exactly the same revision history in > your tracking branches as the repo you're fetching from. In that case, it would be helpful to enumerate exactly how two developers can ensure that they are creating the same revision history. At the very least, svn URL scheme and svnauthors file have to be the same. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
