On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 2008.05.04 11:49:38 -0700, Geoffrey Irving wrote: > > Hello, > > > > There's an asymmetry between push and pull that seems unnecessary: > > pull can pull from local branches, but push can't push to them. Is > > there a reason for this asymmetry? > > > > In more detail, if I have a working copy with two branches, local and > > master, I can use git pull to pull changes from master to local: > > > > % git checkout local > > % git pull . master > > ... pulls changes from master to local branch > > > > If I make a change in local and try to do the reverse with git push, > > it gives a confusing non-error message and doesn't do anything: > > > > % git checkout local > > % git rm scratch/pcomm.h > > % git commit > > % git push . master > > Everything up-to-date > > You're pushing master to master ;-) Try "git push . local:master". > > Björn Yep, that works. I'll remember to use -v next time I don't know what's going on. Is there a reason for the syntax asymmetry? If git pull defaults to pulling into my current branch, why does git push default to uselessly pushing and pulling to the same branch? Also, can I make a bare "git push" default to "git push . local:master"? Geoffrey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
