On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > The second case is "not checked out -- treat me as unmodified", and the > > third case is "the user does not want the submodule there", and the latter > > is still reported as "removed". That is exactly what your patch does. > > Having looked at the code a bit more, I do not think we need the > three-kind distinction for this part. > > The attached patch would be both sufficient and cleaner. The real change > is a single-liner, and everything else is additional comment ;-) I'd > follow it up with s/check_work_tree_entity/check_removed/ for > clarification. > Fine, it's cleaner. -- Ping Yin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
