On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@xxxxxx> wrote: > Johannes Schindelin wrote (2008-05-02 08:45 +0100): > > In general, my opinion is that with international text it's better to > define word boundary characters than trying to maintain a _huge_ list of > characters used within words in different human languages. > Agreed, there is no easy way to designate such a huge list of non-ascii characters. Even if we figure out one way, the user may still be scared by such a huge list or the character class syntax. I think doing this complex both the implementation and the representation. Instead, if using non word characters, the user only needs specify a small list of characters (ascii or wide character). instead of the nearly whole set. -- Ping Yin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
