Re: Making submodules easier to work with (auto-update on checkout or merge, stash & restore submodules)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tim Harper wrote:
OVERVIEW:
On the Git TextMate Bundle, I've automated a lot of the submodule commands to make them not a terrible pain to work with. (don't get me wrong - I really like the git submodule implementation, I just don't like how hard it is to work with).

"WARTS" WITH EXISTING IMPLEMENTATION
1) The submodule stays in the working copy when changing to a branch that does not have a submodule. This can break a build and cause problems. To work around, I have to delete the folder completely (git-clean). Then, when I switch back to the branch again, I have to re-download the submodule. 2) I have to type "git checkout branch && git submodule init && git submodule update" to be sure that I really have the whole contents of the branch. That's 3 commands, and a lot of typing. 3) If I don't run "git submodule update", and carelessly run "git commit -a" or "git add .", I risk propagating a submodule version from another branch or undoing an important change.

SUGGESTED ALGORITHM (AS HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED IN THE GIT TEXTMATE BUNDLE)
When pulling / merging / changing branches:
1) cache all submodules to ~/.git/submodules_cache
a) move from the working directory to a folder that is a MD5 hex-hash of both the submodule path and the submodule url
2) execute the pull / merge / branch change
3) restore all defined submodules to ~/.git/submodules_cache (only the submodules that are still defined after the merge / change / pull)
4) execute git submodule init && git submodule update


PITFALLS:
pitfall)
If you commit a change on a submodule that's not on a branch, auto-updating submodules will make it difficult to revive that change.

workaround)
Don't allow the user to commit unless they are on a branch.

... couldn't think of anymore.  Anyone?

CONCLUSION
So far, this algorithm holds up well in my use cases, and has made submodule management seamless for me (I don't have to know that I'm working with submodules). It's resolved every one of the above outlined interface warts.

Would it be a good idea to build this algorithm into git? What would be the best approach? Am I completely overlooking something by designing the Git TextMate bundle to handle submodules this way?


I don't use submodules at the moment, but I have several "lib-ish" pieces
of code that would benefit greatly from becoming submodules. The not-exactly
seamlessness of them has so far been a hindrance though, but it sounds as
if your changes (assuming they don't affect anything else) should make lessen
the submodule headaches somewhat.

So, where be the patches?

--
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux