Re: [updated PATCH] Protect current tags, import tags into remote tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb@xxxxxxx> writes:

> ..., it currently stores any tags
> directly in refs/tags,...

which is consistent with the way all the native Porcelain commands handle
tags.  There is no per-remote namespace for tags in git Porcelain.

For some people, the patch would be an improvement, but for some other
people, this would be a regression.

It needs discussion and concensus if we were to do this; currently I am
not very much in favor of this change.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux