"Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb@xxxxxxx> writes: > ..., it currently stores any tags > directly in refs/tags,... which is consistent with the way all the native Porcelain commands handle tags. There is no per-remote namespace for tags in git Porcelain. For some people, the patch would be an improvement, but for some other people, this would be a regression. It needs discussion and concensus if we were to do this; currently I am not very much in favor of this change. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html