On 4/24/08, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hmm, maybe it would make sense to put that note in git-prune, with a > note in git-gc to look at the prune page. Perhaps. > But if the note were moved to git-prune, it would be natural to mention > git-reflog there. What do you think? I gather there's a movement in recent git versions (sorry, I only tuned in recently) to encourage people to use git-gc instead of git-prune in almost all cases. The reasons I ever looked at git-prune at all was that git-gc mentioned it in "See Also", and because "git-prune" sounded more obviously like what I wanted than "git-gc" when I looked at "man git". Adding git-gc *and* git-reflog as See Also entries in git-prune would make sense to me. Avery -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
