Junio C Hamano wrote: > I am not an imap-send user myself, but is it the case that the use of > imap.tunnel always makes imap.host useless/unnecessary and safe to be left > as NULL? You're right that it isn't guaranteed to be unnecessary, but equally it's not guaranteed to be necessary - which is just the situation that an optional configuration setting describes. > Driving imapd standalone like the "tunnel" example you quoted above would > trigger preauth behaviour, so that should be safe, but I suspect there are > other ways to use tunnel to just relay the connection over the firewall, > while still requiring the client to authenticate the same way as usual. I'm sure you are correct, but as I say - it's not guaranteed. Since git-imap-send can't know what this particular tunnel requires it shouldn't force the creation of a dummy option. If the tunnel does require a hostname then there is a place to put it, and the person writing the tunnel line can decide that. Andy -- Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET andyparkins@xxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
