Re: crlf with git-svn driving me nuts...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:03:10PM +0100, Nigel Magnay wrote:
> 
> Well.... Newline = LF vs CRLF (vs CR for early mac.. erk) dates to
> well before C and UNIX; back into the days of baudot codes and
> teletype printers that couldn't physically newline in the time taken
> for 1 character to be processed; LF is meant to mean Line Feed and CR
> is meant to mean "Carriage Return", so CRLF is in that sense quite
> logical. But that's standards committees and backwards compatibility
> for you :-/

CRLF is logical from the point of you of teletype printers, but when
we speak about text files then it is more logical to consider them as
a list of lines. What particular symbol is used as line-separator does
not really matter, but IMHO it is stupid to have two symbols for that.
So, LF vs CR is matter of preferences, but CRLF is just stupid -;)

Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux