On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 01:38:18PM -0700, Ray Lee wrote: > > > And frankly, that's the only thing that matters anyway; I suspect > > > I'd do rather well by proposed criteria, but you know what? I don't give > > > a flying f*ck through the rolling doughnut for self-appointed PHBs and > > > their idea of performance reviews. > > > > (Geez, conflate the issue much?) No one is saying you should. But > > also, I haven't seen anyone saying it'd be used for performance > > reviews other than you. > > > || If there are individuals at whom a finger needs to be pointed, this > || system will highlight them, and fingers will (and should) be pointed. > || Contributors of poor-quality code need to be weeded-out. > > in this thread (From: David Newall). Ah, I failed reading comprehension, yet again. Well, sounds like you have a beef to take up with David, then. That's still not an argument against trying to gather statistics and to see if they're worth anything. > > <shrug> Shame and Guilt, two major motivators of human behavior, it's > > true. But, one last time, *you're* the one saying the stats would be > > used for finger pointing at people. > > Not really. Unless you are trying to imply that David is my sock puppet, that > is... Momentarily amusing to think so, but no :-). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
