On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:02:47 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > At least with the data we have currently in git it's impossible to
> > figure that out automatically.
> >
> > E.g. if you look at commit f743d04dcfbeda7439b78802d35305781999aa11
> > (ide/legacy/q40ide.c: add MODULE_LICENSE), how could you determine
> > automatically that it is a bugfix, and the commit that introduced
> > the bug?
> >
> > You can always get some data, but if you want to get usable
> > statistics you need explicit tags in the commits, not some
> > algorithm that tries to guess.
>
> Well yes. One outcome of the project would be to tell us what
> changes we'd need to make to our processes to make such data
> gathering more effective.
also.. "what is a bugfix" is an interesting thing... for some things it's very easy.
For others.. it's really hard to draw a solid line where bugs stop and features start.
(for example, is a missing cpu id in oprofile a bugfix ("oprofile doesn't work") or
a feature ("new cpu support"). This one is one of the more simple ones even...)
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
