Dill <sarpulhu@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Perhaps we should just make the home page a wiki! It would work really > good! If we use a theme like they do at wiki.ubuntu.com or somewhere > else we could make it look really nice for a home page. Then once it's > set up, no one has to manage the page, worry about commits, who's > doing what, etc, and just have the pages edited and worked on by the > community at large who register at the site to edit. First, as far as I now all _popular_ wikis offer quite limited markup. Second, current git homepage has information about latest release, and latest release date etc. updated *automatically*, by the script IIRC examinimg announcement on git mailing list. This I think would be not possible with wiki. > (Unlike the wiki in use now something would have to be done to stop > the spam, like having those boxes at registration where you have > pick the letters out). If you have wiki which is popular page you would have spam. Or you wouldn't have contributors (or at least as many contributors) if you would bring barriers to entry (e.g. register to edit, validation via email, CAPTCHA) against spam. [cut] Many more projects IMVHO have _both_ homepage and wiki, than only wiki (wiki as homepage). P.S. Please do not toppost. If your post doesn't refer to the message you are replying to, simply post it as clean message, without quoted text. -- Jakub Narebski Poland ShadeHawk on #git -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
