Re: question about git and remote repositories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Ittay Dror wrote:
> If I want to start working on a project that uses git (and I want to use 
> git also), I first need to clone the project's repo. That is very slow 
> (using the git:// protocol). Are there alternatives? For example, as far 
> as I understand, if all I want is to get the latest commit in HEAD, 
> branch from it and start working, then all git really needs to have is 
> all objects referenced from that commit (commit, trees, blobs) and 
> that's it, right? (as long as I don't expect to see full log of past 
> operations)

In git terms, that is called a "shallow clone". For example:

git clone --depth 5 git://site.com/repo.git

would clone all the heads of repo.git along with their 5 most
recent commits.

You can make history deeper with

git-fetch --depth 20 git://site.com/repo.git branch

See the glossary, technical/shallow.txt, git-clone and git-fetch
man pages.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux