Re: symbolic link management in git-archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



René Scharfe wrote:

Windows 2000 and up has support for symbolic links; it's just strangely
restricted, [...] here's a good starting point for
more information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS_junction_point

Arguably, your unzip program should create junction points for symlinks
in zip files.  I wouldn't be surprised if none of the existing ones
support that, though;

Would it be practical for you to distribute a junction point creation
tool like Mark Russinovich's Junction (except that Junction's EULA
forbids redistribution under most circumstances; see here:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysinternals/FileAndDisk/Junction.mspx)
and a script that creates these symlinks for your audience?
Thank you very much for the detailed explanation. Unfortunately, I do not think that Junction can be an option. My colleagues using Windows tend to be a bit "conservative" about the tools they use. If they navigate filesystem contents with the graphical tool, and they look-at/expand the content of a zip file from explorer they expect that it should be immediately right, otherwise there must be something wrong in the way /I/ create zip files. They would not appreciate having to unzip the file and then run an additional program on it to fix the unzipped stuff.
It's harder for git-archive to support following symlinks than for e.g.
GNU tar.  The reason is that the former operates on git objects, not
files, directories or symlinks.  In order to follow a symlink it would
need to evaluate the symlink, follow it and then add actual files and
directories to the archive.

For your purposes, perhaps a slightly different implementation might be
sufficient: namely to follow only relative symlinks that point to
tracked objects.  That way you still get a repeatable result and (most
importantly) git-archive doesn't need to look at files and directories,
it can stay safely in git land.  Would such a way of operation be useful
to you?
Absolutely positive. This would be already a great improvement, fulfilling 99.9% of needs.

Sergio

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux