Jeff King wrote:
> Since it looks like you are using mutt also, I will warn you that
> there is a problem with this workflow: when mutt does the resend, it
> generates a new message-id. Thus the patches are all connected in a
> thread because they all in-reply-to the cover letter, but the cover
> letter is not connected, since it has a new message-id.
>
> I'm not sure if there is a way to fix this short of patching mutt.
> :(
I don't know if it would help, but perhaps you could try:
:set postponed=/path/to/your/format-patch-mbox
instead of opening the mbox using -f, and then recall the messages to
send. That *might* prevent mutt from rewriting the message-id, but I
haven't tested it at all.
--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Between two evils, I always pick the one I never tried before.
-- Mae West
Attachment:
pgp0SlAHp4ElZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
