Re: symbolic link management in git-archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster <at> pobox.com> writes:

> 
> Under such an option, at least the comment in the archive (both for zip
> and tar) that notes which revision the tarball was taken from should be
> omitted.  As long as that is done, I think it is Ok to have such an
> optional behaviour.
> 

yes, I overlooked this, but it makes perfect sense: if it is not an exact copy
of the tracked state, it should not pretend to be so by indicating a revision.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux